HP EliteBook 755 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 755 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 221C
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150901
Uptime3 Days
Run DateMay 15 '16 at 05:52
Run Duration96 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8 PRO-7150B R5, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G
Socket FS1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.5% Below average
Memory 56.6
1-Core 33.8
2-Core 63.2
34% 51.2 Pts
4-Core 84
8-Core 97.6
12% 90.8 Pts
64-Core 94.8
6% 94.8 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 221C) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
3.85% Terrible
Lighting 4.67
Reflection 5.77
Parallax 5.47
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 6.09
4% 4.65 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.85%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BF180A4H SED 180GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSTi Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 428
Write 161
Mixed 203
58% 264 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 13.9
61% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 90.4
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 34.4
40% 68.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.3% Poor
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.9
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.1
SC Mixed 7.4
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 755 G2 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 755 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback