MSI B85M-P33 V2 (MS-7846)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive97.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7846
MotherboardMSI B85M-P33 V2 (MS-7846)  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '18 at 15:08
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 165
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 353
48% 356 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 8489) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.93
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 24% Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 159 56 43 47 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 474
Mixed 358
SusWrite 113
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 51.2
174% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 231
209% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 118%
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$72
19GB free, PID 1697
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 180
Write 139
Mixed 85.2
160% 135 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.2
85% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 52%
Motorola CS3070 0GB
0GB free, PID 1a00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.8 2.8 3.6 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
6.65% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 4
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 3.6
8% 7.22 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.4
94% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.65%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.3
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 18
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-P33 V2 (MS-7846) Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI B85M-P33 V2 (MS-7846)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback