Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 24 '18 at 14:21
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 229
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 406
8-Core 595
62% 500 Pts
64-Core 587
36% 587 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.6% Very good
Lighting 95.5
Reflection 107
Parallax 89.8
78% 97.3 fps
MRender 94
Gravity 91.9
Splatting 95.9
77% 94 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 298 305 305 304 307 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 318
Mixed 311
SusWrite 306
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 39.7
150% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 249
213% 314 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
111GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 105 109 109 110 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 130
Write 98.2
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 107
72% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
167GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 114 113 113 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 74.2
Write 93.7
Mixed 85
SusWrite 113
68% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
274% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 90%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 250G 250GB
103GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 228 234 237 238 239 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 242
Write 236
Mixed 232
SusWrite 235
323% 236 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 23.2
1,746% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 32.7
DQ Mixed 27.3
2,129% 27.9 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 171%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.M16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 17.1
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 19.6
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $56

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $293
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback