Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 60% Gunboat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	77.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180326
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '18 at 13:29
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Memory 90 1-Core 119 2-Core 207 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 365 8-Core 598 59% 481 Pts	64-Core 606 38% 606 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.1% Very good	Lighting 95 Reflection 106 Parallax 98.3 77% 99.9 fps	MRender 92.5 Gravity 91.1 Splatting 95.5 76% 93 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,977 Write 3,454 Mixed 3,476 810% 3,636 MB/s	4K Read 407 4K Write 183 4K Mixed 226 1,004% 272 MB/s	DQ Read 861 DQ Write 489 DQ Mixed 664 497% 671 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 10,357 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 167GB free Firmware: D781 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 113 114 113 113 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	79.8% Very good	Read 164 Write 150 Mixed 94.4 SusWrite 112 96% 130 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.8 382% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 118GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 98 97 98 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	61.9% Good	Read 118 Write 104 Mixed 72.6 SusWrite 97.1 72% 98.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.M16 2x8GB 4,109 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 17.2 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 18.8 52% 18.2 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $56

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	466x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	298x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	223x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	303x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	203x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	174x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	139x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	60x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	55x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $293

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16