Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A75 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateSep 23 '18 at 22:21
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 116
50% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 147
22% 158 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Zotac(19DA 1294) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
9.04% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 8.19
Parallax 9.88
8% 9.41 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 13.2
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.04%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
470GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 77 74 90 97 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 141
Write 120
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 90.3
73% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 257 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 6.7
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A75 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback