Asrock X79 Extreme9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme9  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140214
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateSep 22 '18 at 06:34
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 89.4
2-Core 190
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 495
46% 380 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 237 227 277 195 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 1,586
Write 747
Mixed 900
SusWrite 260
193% 873 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 45.3
151% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 504
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 177
173% 285 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 141%
Great: 244%
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
270GB free
Firmware: 001C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 873 543 542 546 548 545 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,907
Write 1,359
Mixed 653
SusWrite 600
250% 1,130 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 40.4
132% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 606
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 510
359% 462 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 173%
Great: 293%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-1600 CL1 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 30.7
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme9 Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme9 - $1,200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback