Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101101
Uptime	7.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '18 at 15:03
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 660 5,902 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 71.4 1-Core 86.9 2-Core 153 61% 104 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 214 29% 215 Pts	64-Core 201 12% 201 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84DD) 2GB CLim: 1398 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17% Very poor	Lighting 20.1 Reflection 17 Parallax 20.8 16% 19.3 fps	MRender 26.1 Gravity 24.1 Splatting 18.2 18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB-$400 12,355 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 200 210 211 211 211 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.8% Above average	Read 219 Write 210 Mixed 164 SusWrite 202 45% 199 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 27.1 93% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 29.6 DQ Write 98.9 DQ Mixed 35.5 36% 54.7 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 106%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 94GB free Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 191 197 197 196 188 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.6% Above average	Read 189 Write 198 Mixed 182 SusWrite 189 43% 189 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 28.8 99% 34.2 MB/s	DQ Read 33.4 DQ Write 85.6 DQ Mixed 40.6 36% 53.2 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 95%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1GB free Firmware: JA0OA480 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 96.3 Write 91.6 Mixed 37.8 55% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 57%
JetDrive Transcend 121GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 127% 21GB free, PID 07d1 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 185 183 178 182 187 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	140% Outstanding	Read 202 Write 167 Mixed 122 SusWrite 180 222% 168 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 22.3 4K Mixed 14.7 1,304% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 14.6 DQ Write 27.4 DQ Mixed 19.7 1,656% 20.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 140% Great: 193%
ST964032 2AS 640GB 294GB free, PID 0888 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 24 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10.8% Very poor	Read 23.7 Write 23 Mixed 17.6 SusWrite 23.2 30% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 43% 0.57 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.6% Below average	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 13.4 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 8.4 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 98.2 41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55-USB3 Builds (Compare 441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55-USB3

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	144x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	86x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	74x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	28x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	21x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	19x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	96x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	69x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $244

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16