ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8Z77-V LK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	17.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

9 years ago, 9 years ago, 9 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V LK (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121023
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '14 at 15:54
Run Duration	391 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 102 2-Core 204 69% 153 Pts	4-Core 380 8-Core 390 51% 385 Pts	64-Core 404 25% 404 Pts
Poor: 50% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140 47,409 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Gigabyte(1458 226C) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.301.1001.0 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Lighting 33.1 Reflection 31 Parallax 41.5 27% 35.2 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2.5TB free Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 100 100 21474836480 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 4 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 6 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1059 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 36 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 36 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 197569740840 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 6 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25 19,988 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 342GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 159 156 5016 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5797 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 32635 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1409 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 84 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5795 (C2) HDA temperature 106 89 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	60.4% Good	Read 111 Write 99.7 Mixed 95.7 77% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.42 118% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 65%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 207GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 161 159 4941 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1498 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 46 46 39526 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1484 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 120 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1496 (C2) HDA temperature 105 93 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.8% Average	Read 86.6 Write 58.7 Mixed 76.4 56% 73.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.31 86% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 69%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40 13,720 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 140 140 3958 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 531 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12318 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 529 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 28 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 502 (C2) HDA temperature 101 94 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	55.2% Above average	Read 97.1 Write 95.3 Mixed 94.7 72% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.36 93% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 65%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 32GB-$11 2,386 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 30GB free, PID db8a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 33.2 Write 16.1 Mixed 21.6 28% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.11 4K Write 0.78 4K Mixed 0.23 50% 1.71 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 37%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 29GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 12.9 Mixed 15.2 23% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0.28 4K Mixed 0.02 32% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 28%
Patriot Memory 8GB 549 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 7GB free, PID 3100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	7.95% Terrible	Read 31 Write 9.41 Mixed 12 18% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.68 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 22% 1.91 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.95% Great: 11%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical P8Z77-V LK Builds (Compare 2,196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LK - $140

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	695x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	570x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	358x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	143x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	129x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	116x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	78x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	69x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	63x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	55x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	47x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $387

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback