Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5506-$53 722 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Memory 82.1 1-Core 53.2 2-Core 98 50% 77.8 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 208 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 34F1) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.06% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 2.04 Parallax 0.47 1% 1.25 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.43 1% 1.42 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.06% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.U SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 221 226 229 231 231 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.8% Above average	Read 227 Write 220 Mixed 208 SusWrite 227 50% 220 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 19.5 73% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 197 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 62.4 82% 149 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown MXIC 25L3205 38GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1333, 1333, 33 MHz 1024, 1024, 36864 MB Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 4.6 14% 5.03 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 5 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	5x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	5x
GeForce GT 545NvidiaBench 6%, 2,995 samples	4x

SSD
840 120GBSamsung $109Bench 61%, 51,792 samples	4x
X150 120GBEmtecBench 64%, 886 samples	4x
MZ7LM480HCHP-00005 480GBSamsungBench 94%, 39 samples	3x

RAM
MXIC 25L3205 48GBUnknownBench 42%, 111 samples	13x
MXIC 25L3205 52GBUnknownBench 35%, 71 samples	12x
MXIC 25L3205 42GBUnknownBench 40%, 50 samples	3x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $239