Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 169 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 334 45% 335 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% EVGA(3842 3686) 2GB CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Lighting 41.4 Reflection 39.6 Parallax 52.1 34% 44.4 fps	MRender 52.7 Gravity 46.4 Splatting 37.2 36% 45.4 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300 8,179 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 830GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 892 504 501 503 500 501 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 85% Great: 132%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 164 163 165 165 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 170 Write 154 Mixed 88.3 SusWrite 164 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.9 193% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 4x8GB 1,052 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.4% Above average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 16.4 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 17.1 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	4x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	2x
GeForce GT 545NvidiaBench 6%, 2,995 samples	1x
GTX 570Nvidia $350Bench 20%, 22,303 samples	1x

SSD
PLUS 1000GBSandiskBench 44%, 44,528 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	4x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $250