Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3470 8,730 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 94 1-Core 80.2 2-Core 160 68% 111 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 385 43% 337 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% MSI(1462 8A9B) CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Lighting 22.9 Reflection 17.2 Parallax 20.6 19% 20.3 fps	MRender 25.8 Gravity 23.8 Splatting 17 18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 19%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB-$38 10,195 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 281GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP4O SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 68 86 94 85 91 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 89.3 Write 79.5 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 84.2 55% 74.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	41.5% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 13.1 MC Mixed 12.5 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 11.9 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16