Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 90.3 2-Core 192 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 387 52% 388 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.28% Terrible	Lighting 5.07 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 4.88 4% 4.81 fps	MRender 6.48 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.17 4% 5.52 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.28% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 72 85 85 85 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 118 Write 90.5 Mixed 115 SusWrite 81.7 23% 101 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 15.1 71% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 95.6 DQ Write 99.4 DQ Mixed 85.2 68% 93.4 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 73%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 420GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 120 120 118 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Read 126 Write 122 Mixed 63.3 SusWrite 119 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 029E VS2GB1333D3 6GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.8% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 14.3 43% 15 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	425x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	93x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	107x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 52%, 14,558 samples	104x
M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 6,893 samples	78x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80