Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 09 '16 at 14:59
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User KHM-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670-$53
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 68.6
2-Core 138
62% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 626
56% 471 Pts
64-Core 791
49% 791 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.150.2211.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Lighting 62.7
Reflection 55.8
Parallax 71
51% 63.1 fps
MRender 55
Gravity 49.7
Splatting 70.8
49% 58.5 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ABA100V 1TB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU2OA720 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 85.5
Write 93.6
Mixed 98.1
70% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 0.63
4K Mixed 0.14
38% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
153GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 92.8
Write 130
Mixed 119
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.41
77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS512MLK64V6N 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.8% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 17.3
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $727
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback