Asrock X58 Extreme

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock X58 Extreme (all builds)
Memory	4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '18 at 08:46
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5675 8,072 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Memory 96 1-Core 111 2-Core 222 82% 143 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 664 67% 546 Pts	64-Core 796 49% 796 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E285) CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.8.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Lighting 65.2 Reflection 58 Parallax 73.9 53% 65.7 fps	MRender 58.1 Gravity 52.5 Splatting 73.7 52% 61.4 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215 19,372 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 230 238 239 238 239 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.5% Good	Read 247 Write 239 Mixed 206 SusWrite 237 52% 232 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 28.4 96% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 191 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 189 141% 187 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 104%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 345GB free Firmware: AX0R2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 83 83 82 83 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	47% Average	Read 81 Write 76.2 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 82.6 49% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	47.2% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 14.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 54 74% 54 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 Extreme Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock X58 Extreme

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	48x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	23x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	22x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	11x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	9x

SSD
AGILITY2 60GBOCZBench 36%, 652 samples	9x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	31x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	15x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $207

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16