Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive298% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX CODE  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.9 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '18 at 01:53
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 98
1-Core 151
2-Core 293
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 824
78% 649 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
EVGA(3842 3658) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 18.7
16% 19.7 fps
MRender 28.5
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 24.6
20% 24.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1771 1796 1772 1796 1358 773 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,307
Write 1,941
Mixed 936
SusWrite 1,544
376% 1,682 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 65.8
223% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,017
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 908
692% 935 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 298%
Great: 353%
Seagate NAS HDD 2TB-$98
401GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 142 143 143 144 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 151
Write 151
Mixed 69
SusWrite 142
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84%
Great: 100%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180
41GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 87 83 86 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 85.8
Write 85.5
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 86.7
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
227% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4266 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 31.2
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 50.5
SC Mixed 34.7
104% 36.5 GB/s
Latency 46.2
86% 46.2 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,133
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback