Packard EasyNote TE11HC

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	63.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Packard EasyNote TE11HC (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard EG50_HC_CR
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120914
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '18 at 10:09
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	64% Good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 77.3 2-Core 142 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 333 34% 277 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 67%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 1982) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Lighting 79.7 Reflection 80.8 Parallax 75.4 65% 78.6 fps	MRender 79.1 Gravity 76.2 Splatting 67.7 60% 74.3 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 66%
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 064B) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.86% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 3.15 Parallax 1.38 2% 2.19 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.74 2% 2.61 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.86% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 149 175 171 171 175 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	66.7% Good	Read 455 Write 433 Mixed 135 SusWrite 182 67% 301 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 24.4 82% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 202 168% 245 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 97%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55 30,952 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 56GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 90 92 92 91 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 83 Write 90.5 Mixed 52 SusWrite 90.6 58% 79 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 1,624 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	49.8% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.8 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 15.1 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EasyNote TE11HC Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TE11HC

CPU
Pentium B960IntelBench 44%, 13,355 samples	35x
Celeron B830IntelBench 43%, 3,455 samples	29x
Core i3-2328MIntelBench 47%, 7,778 samples	27x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	88x
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	63x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	26x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	7x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	5x

RAM
HMT451S6MFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 3,609 samples	17x
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 25%, 3,468 samples	12x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 8,481 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16