HP ProDesk 600 G2 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive75.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G2 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 805D
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '18 at 08:33
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 213
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 393
54% 398 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000H1 256GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 157 141 147 181 164 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 483
Write 342
Mixed 166
SusWrite 161
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 30.7
116% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 157
142% 219 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 125 126 125 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 122
Write 128
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 125
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9E02] CMV4GX4M1A2133C15 Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
72.5% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 22.1
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 21.4
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G2 MT Builds (Compare 850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G2 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback