PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M4A78T-E (all builds) |
Memory | 13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110413 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 09 '18 at 19:16 |
Run Duration | 169 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
61.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
17.9%
Very poor
|
||||
ATI Radeon HD 3300
Asus(1043 834D) 384MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.630.0.0
|
0.76%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
508GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 91 92 90 90 93 MB/s
|
61.6%
Good
|
|||
56.5%
Above average
|
||||
56.3%
Above average
|
||||
45%
Average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.3%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 16x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 13x |
Athlon II X4 620AMDBench 44%, 5,981 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 3300ATIBench 1%, 913 samples | 13x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $177 |