Asus M4N68T LE V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive7.39% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4N68T LE V2  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110614
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 09 '18 at 10:18
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X3 720
AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 39.8
2-Core 79.1
42% 63.6 Pts
4-Core 87.5
8-Core 102
12% 94.5 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Asus(1043 83A6) 1GB
CLim: 811 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.31% Terrible
Lighting 9.67
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 8.09
8% 9.64 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 10
Splatting 11
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.31%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0307
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 35 79 73 87 40 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
7.39% Terrible
Read 46.2
Write 87
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 53.1
11% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 2.5
7% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 7.39%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$37
141GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 96 104 102 107 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
56% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 100
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 102
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 56%
Great: 59%
SSK SHE088 250GB
226GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 21
Write 19.5
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 20.5
27% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 10.1
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.9
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N68T LE V2 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T LE V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback