PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H61-M PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130918 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 08 '18 at 19:38 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
81.3%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7
|
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 240 248 249 248 250 MB/s
|
69.1%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
831GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 106 107 106 107 107 MB/s
|
55.3%
Above average
|
|||
PHD 3.0 Silicon-Power 1TB
622GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 92 92 92 92 92 MB/s
|
40.3%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
61.6%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600Intel $191Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 30x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 29x |
Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 20x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 33x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 26x |
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $229 |