bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SR
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime1 Days
Run DateSep 08 '18 at 03:18
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 194
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 499
50% 409 Pts
64-Core 497
31% 497 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
EVGA(3842 1563) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1053 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 25.5
Parallax 19.4
18% 22.2 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 23.3
20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 416 414 422 389 297 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 483
Write 452
Mixed 274
SusWrite 395
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 28.1
97% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 162
172% 285 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$37
202GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 72 60 68 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 99.9
Write 99.2
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 75.9
65% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 76%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323
647GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 110 111 111 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
62% Good
Read 105
Write 105
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 110
73% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
217% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62%
Great: 93%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323
38GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 123 123 124 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 131
Write 133
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 123
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 93%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$40
248GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 107 108 109 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 86.4
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 108
63% 86.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
208% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 85%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$40
24GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 127 96 139 121 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 125
Write 124
Mixed 94.7
SusWrite 114
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$37
199GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 67 67 68 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 104
Write 92.7
Mixed 68
SusWrite 68.1
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x434D5031364758334D3458313630304337 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 29.9
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback