bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DX79SR
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 18 '18 at 20:29
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 184
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 492
52% 414 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
EVGA(3842 1563) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1053 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 19.5
18% 22.2 fps
MRender 29
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 23.4
20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 480GB-$199
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X21200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 439 399 431 425 428 417 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 453
Mixed 326
SusWrite 423
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 28
96% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 157
170% 285 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
202GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 82 73 60 69 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 99.1
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 76.1
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 76%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323
647GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 109 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63% Good
Read 109
Write 102
Mixed 70
SusWrite 110
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 63%
Great: 93%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323
38GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 123 124 125 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 133
Write 136
Mixed 90.8
SusWrite 124
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 93%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
248GB free
Firmware: 01.01L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 108 108 109 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 93.2
Write 89.4
Mixed 62.8
SusWrite 108
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 85%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
24GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 127 96 139 121 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 131
Write 124
Mixed 83
SusWrite 114
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
236GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 68 68 67 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 105
Write 95.4
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 68
60% 81.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x434D5031364758334D3458313630304337 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1334 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 30.1
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback