Asus GL703VD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus GL703VD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL703VD
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171003
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateSep 07 '18 at 15:12
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 113
2-Core 218
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 603
65% 516 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1BC0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6136
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 6.94
6% 12.8 fps
MRender 7.67
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 13.9
8% 9.29 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SN8U256G1002 256GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4131002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 202 185 184 187 186 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 363
Write 340
Mixed 274
SusWrite 200
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 25.4
78% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.4
DQ Write 56.5
DQ Mixed 33.9
28% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 89%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
930GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 123 127 122 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 131
Write 115
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 124
72% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 13.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL703VD Builds (Compare 518 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL703VD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback