Asus ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171017
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateSep 06 '18 at 03:47
Run Duration324 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 92
1-Core 159
2-Core 316
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 621
8-Core 980
99% 800 Pts
64-Core 1,313
81% 1,313 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 104%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
110% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 169
Parallax 166
118% 160 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 155
Splatting 112
103% 127 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 545 280 264 251 261 269 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,933
Write 1,406
Mixed 672
SusWrite 312
239% 1,081 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 54.4
233% 88.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,067
DQ Write 1,206
DQ Mixed 844
717% 1,039 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 217%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
155GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 453 462 357 307 308 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 472
Mixed 414
SusWrite 390
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 69.6
238% 86.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 434 464 467 472 472 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 461
Mixed 446
SusWrite 457
105% 464 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 64.6
220% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 288
216% 288 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA3M0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 160 162 163 164 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 156
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 163
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 92%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 4TB
878GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 17 17 17 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 89.5
Write 117
Mixed 104
SusWrite 19.2
62% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
430% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 85%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
48% Average
Read 149
Write 43
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 18.2
50% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 48%
Great: 94%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 17 17 17 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 87%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 17 17 17 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 84%
SABRENT DISK03 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 395 386 289 281 282 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 97.7
Write 399
Mixed 311
SusWrite 338
438% 286 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 18.5
1,554% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 9.9
DQ Write 27.2
DQ Mixed 20
1,642% 19 MB/s
Poor: 112%
This bench: 170%
Great: 170%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.2% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 22.9
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 23.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA Builds (Compare 983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $927
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback