Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 05 '18 at 19:02
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 70.7
2-Core 109
56% 87 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 401
40% 323 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.2% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 64.3
Parallax 53.6
54% 61.3 fps
MRender 74.1
Gravity 68
Splatting 62.3
55% 68.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 378 365 361 364 361 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 424
Mixed 357
SusWrite 366
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 44.7
145% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 255
191% 255 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 134%
WL1500GSA6472C 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 60.0AB60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 83 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 84.7
Write 77.5
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 84.7
56% 76.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 62%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 115 114 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 95.2
Write 98.7
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 116
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL7-2GBXH 64C0MHHHJ-HS F3-10666CL7-2GBXH 64C0MHHHJ-HS 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 12.7
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback