Asus H61M-F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-F  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime3 Days
Run DateSep 05 '18 at 04:25
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 192
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 464
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 31.9
29% 30.8 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 33
Splatting 32.2
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 257
Write 150
Mixed 129
39% 179 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 26.7
99% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 115
105% 161 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 91%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2
Write 17.5
Mixed 13.7
8% 11.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
7GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 46.7
Write 61.2
Mixed 28.5
34% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
2GB free
Firmware: MKAOA5C0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8
Write 17
Mixed 13
10% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 87%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
5GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.7
Write 33.3
Mixed 25.2
38% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 18%
Generic- Compact Flash 16GB
6GB free, PID 6361
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30.8
Write 16.7
Mixed 15.5
24% 21 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2
130% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
49.9% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-F Builds (Compare 168 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback