Acer Aspire F5-573G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire F5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Captain_SK
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160426
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateSep 03 '18 at 09:29
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 166
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 259
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 108F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4534
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.83% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 5.47
5% 7.27 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 12.6
8% 8.69 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.83%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B256 256GB
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G881201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 339 272 244 230 224 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 413
Write 347
Mixed 299
SusWrite 268
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 69.4
4K Mixed 27.8
95% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 263
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 190
167% 247 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 98%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 129 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 111
Write 95.8
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 128
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.1
244% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR21D4S15HAG/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 25.6
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 21.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire F5-573G Builds (Compare 1,617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire F5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback