Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 31 '18 at 18:53
Run Duration	452 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	82.6% Excellent	Memory 79.2 1-Core 125 2-Core 232 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 462 8-Core 773 75% 618 Pts	64-Core 1,269 78% 1,269 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6850 31,600 User benchmarks, average bench 12% MSI(1462 2441) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 19.3 Reflection 14.8 Parallax 16.1 16% 16.7 fps	MRender 12.4 Gravity 12.8 Splatting 19 12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170 93,447 User benchmarks, average bench 322% 365GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2042 1966 1977 1968 1956 1974 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	352% Outstanding	Read 2,770 Write 2192 Mixed 1,538 SusWrite 1,981 475% 2,120 MB/s	4K Read 58.9 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 77.9 268% 95.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,023 DQ Write 642 DQ Mixed 773 592% 813 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 352% Great: 393%
SanDisk X110 256GB-$100 4,989 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 211GB free Firmware: X231600 SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 438 438 442 441 436 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 422 Mixed 224 SusWrite 438 87% 386 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 74.4 4K Mixed 32.6 125% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 319 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 130 134% 221 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 100%
HFS256G32MNB-2202A 256GB 169 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 202GB free Firmware: 10103L00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 379 389 412 412 410 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 398 Mixed 344 SusWrite 401 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 71.2 4K Mixed 28.9 109% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 242 203% 295 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 95%
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 143GB free Firmware: SAFM00.Y SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 476 475 479 478 476 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 488 Mixed 316 SusWrite 475 100% 444 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 76.6 4K Mixed 36.8 132% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 354 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 69.2 132% 262 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 111%
SSD 120GB 120GB 4,995 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 112GB free Firmware: L0306 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 96 99 98 101 100 MB/s Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.3% Above average	Read 158 Write 124 Mixed 135 SusWrite 96.2 29% 128 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 78.4 4K Mixed 33.1 125% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 129 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 116 90% 124 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 81%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 216GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 480 480 481 482 480 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 481 Mixed 370 SusWrite 479 104% 461 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 90.5 4K Mixed 44.8 157% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 349 266% 360 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 261GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 156 159 158 163 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 93.8 Write 74.7 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 158 73% 99.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 113%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 129GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 119 120 120 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 185 Write 154 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 118 173% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 69%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 196GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 71 119 120 120 119 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 148 Write 146 Mixed 30 SusWrite 91.6 132% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 53%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 70GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 124 Write 116 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 0.2 80% 68.2 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 53%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 27GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 47 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 189 Write 148 Mixed 81 SusWrite 26.9 134% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 69%
WDC WD40 PURZ-85TTDY0 4TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 125 127 126 126 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.4% Average	Read 88.2 Write 89.8 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 126 120% 87.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 48%
WDC WD40 PURX-64NZ6Y0 4TB 2GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 146 Write 151 Mixed 74.7 153% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 129% 1.53 MB/s

ST4000DM 000-2AE166 4TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 14GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 90 89 90 89 90 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 166 Write 141 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 88.2 150% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 58%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 67 80 69 76 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 120 Write 88.3 Mixed 69 SusWrite 73.5 113% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.9 154% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	MC Read 32.6 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 28 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 22.1 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 24.4 72% 25 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	421x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	218x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $644

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)