Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite L645 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel Base Board Product Name
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100915
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '16 at 12:46
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Memory 63.3 1-Core 58.6 2-Core 111 47% 77.6 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 152 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FDD0) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2993 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.84% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.19 Parallax 0.84 1% 0.98 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.65 1% 1.25 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.84% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89 11,245 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231600 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 548 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 174 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 25 (A8) Unknown 100 100 87 (A9) Unknown 100 100 215 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 17 (AE) Unknown 100 100 13 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 44 188980133926 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 56 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2323 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1028 (F2) Unknown 253 253 995 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	35.9% Below average	Read 195 Write 188 Mixed 152 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 10.3 50% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 21.6 DQ Write 55.7 DQ Mixed 11.5 17% 29.6 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 89%
MMC Card 32GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 3GB free, PID null Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	8.17% Terrible	Read 16.1 Write 9.7 Mixed 12.4 15% 12.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.76 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.76 70% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.17% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F M471B5673FH0-CF8 4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.8 24% 8.53 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 25%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	56x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	6x
Radeon HD 6500MAMDBench 3%, 12,937 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
120GB 120GBRX7Bench 27%, 5 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	6x
M471B5673FH0-CF8 M471B2873FHS-CF8 3GBUnknownBench 22%, 293 samples	4x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 5,165 samples	4x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $158