Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	57.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (80%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3161-A1
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120716
Uptime	6.6 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '18 at 04:19
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	80%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 86 2-Core 170 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 330 44% 331 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.5% Above average	Lighting 70 Reflection 73.7 Parallax 63.1 57% 68.9 fps	MRender 73.9 Gravity 68.5 Splatting 71.3 58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30 32,167 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0126A SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 412 417 432 434 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 428 Mixed 426 SusWrite 380 97% 430 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 57.4 4K Mixed 39.7 127% 42.4 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 240 201% 286 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 107%
WD Green 500GB (2012) 31,295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 252GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 106 108 109 108 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 113 Write 108 Mixed 88.2 SusWrite 108 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 4x2GB 306 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 16 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 68.2 59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO P710 Builds (Compare 644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	232x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	97x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	53x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	109x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	69x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	40x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	24x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	10x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	17x
M378B5773CH0-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 50%, 789 samples	8x
M378B5773CH0-CK0 4x2GBSamsungBench 57%, 306 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16