Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 30 '18 at 01:53
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 72.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 224 75% 136 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 712 66% 552 Pts	64-Core 1,089 67% 1,089 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Sapphire(174B 2015) CLim: 985 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.8.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Lighting 30 Reflection 31.7 Parallax 38.4 24% 33.4 fps	MRender 28.4 Gravity 23.7 Splatting 37.4 25% 29.9 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 77 109 96 80 138 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 472 Write 92.8 Mixed 291 SusWrite 113 53% 242 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 76.2 4K Mixed 1.6 75% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 2.6 71% 165 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 86%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 51GB free Firmware: 05.04E05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 44 45 43 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 34.8 Write 33.7 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 44.3 25% 34.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 44%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 172GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 92 93 94 96 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 88.6 Write 85.4 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 93.7 59% 80.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 2x8GB 3,272 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	MC Read 34.3 MC Write 32.8 MC Mixed 28.7 91% 31.9 GB/s	SC Read 22 SC Write 31.5 SC Mixed 25.4 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 94.9 42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,468x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,308x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,008x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	952x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	736x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	655x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	717x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	340x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	285x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	293x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	227x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $354

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16