PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 26% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 60.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20140408 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 27 '18 at 16:59 |
Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
Run User | IDN-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
74%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.11.4
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z320
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 77 77 77 77 77 MB/s
|
60.4%
Good
|
|||
48.9%
Average
|
||||
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
13GB free, PID 6544
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.9 0.9 1 0.9 1 MB/s
|
0.24%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
|
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 864x |
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples | 209x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 146x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 110x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 83x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 81x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $630 |