Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory45 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170620
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '18 at 20:59
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 215
72% 131 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 659
65% 530 Pts
64-Core 868
54% 868 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.43
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 37.2
32% 36 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 37.6
Splatting 35.8
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0518BS
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 434 430 434 438 436 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 484
Write 441
Mixed 395
SusWrite 434
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 32.7
120% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 140
107% 144 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 110%
WD Purple Surveillance 3TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 139 139 138 140 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 136
Write 141
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 139
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 110%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
907GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 97 97 96 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 120
Write 110
Mixed 64
SusWrite 96.7
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 3x16GB
3 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.7% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 24.9
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 24.2
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 945 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback