Asus STRIX Z270G GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270G GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '18 at 10:29
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Memory 96.8
1-Core 146
2-Core 289
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 550
71% 537 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 40.5
36% 29.2 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 42.3
Splatting 40.3
25% 28.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 120GB-$79
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 118 116 123 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 411
Write 142
Mixed 185
SusWrite 118
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 41.2
162% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 114
100% 151 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 144 144 142 144 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 167
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 144
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
291GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 109 110 109 110 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 118
Write 113
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 110
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 69%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
261GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 70 70 70 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 69
Write 53.7
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 70.4
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 54%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$7
14GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 22 15 8 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 35.7
Write 20.2
Mixed 25
SusWrite 16.8
31% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.4
224% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 30.1
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 31.5
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 51
78% 51 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 97%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270G GAMING Builds (Compare 1,345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270G GAMING - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $831
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback