Runing X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardRuning X79  (all builds)
Memory124.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '18 at 18:03
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 139
59% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 625
56% 473 Pts
64-Core 1,015
63% 1,015 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1279 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.4% Average
Lighting 49.3
Reflection 66.1
Parallax 69.4
40% 61.6 fps
MRender 67.2
Gravity 50
Splatting 55.3
47% 57.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 577 322 322 327 324 326 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
171% Outstanding
Read 1,773
Write 1333
Mixed 560
SusWrite 366
223% 1,008 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 89.2
4K Mixed 51.8
181% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 599
DQ Write 405
DQ Mixed 483
366% 496 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 171%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
857GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 167 169 166 165 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 158
Mixed 87
SusWrite 166
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
800GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 155 156 156 156 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 146
Mixed 87
SusWrite 155
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
234% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4A 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 36.5
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Runing X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $752
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback