Runing X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardRuning X79  (all builds)
Memory123.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '18 at 21:27
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 175
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 643
56% 478 Pts
64-Core 1,018
63% 1,018 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1279 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.7% Average
Lighting 49.7
Reflection 65.8
Parallax 69.6
40% 61.7 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 50.3
Splatting 55.3
47% 57.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 577 325 323 327 323 322 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,710
Write 1,304
Mixed 549
SusWrite 366
217% 982 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 44.7
165% 58.6 MB/s
DQ Read 634
DQ Write 421
DQ Mixed 498
379% 518 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 165%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
861GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 162 165 166 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 167
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 164
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
804GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 149 153 153 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 146
Write 136
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 152
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4A 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 32.1
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Runing X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $752
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback