Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF  (all builds)
Memory105.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '18 at 17:26
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 78
1-Core 143
2-Core 287
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 528
8-Core 1108
96% 818 Pts
64-Core 2,005
124% 2,005 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1093 1095 726 525 233 232 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 2,258
Write 997
Mixed 899
SusWrite 651
265% 1,201 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 51
185% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 522
DQ Write 899
DQ Mixed 702
535% 708 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 219%
Great: 372%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1133 1145 1209 1249 1179 1165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,840
Write 1,126
Mixed 865
SusWrite 1180
279% 1,253 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 43.3
161% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 680
DQ Write 598
DQ Mixed 627
473% 635 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 223%
Great: 484%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-152.A00G 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2932 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 61.3
MC Mixed 36.8
128% 44.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 9.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 110%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback