Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF  (all builds)
Memory105 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 24 '18 at 17:15
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User BIH-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 76.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
93% 175 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,141
104% 870 Pts
64-Core 2,071
128% 2,071 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1117 1019 770 350 327 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2754
Write 1,067
Mixed 934
SusWrite 624
295% 1,345 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 51.4
185% 70.7 MB/s
DQ Read 517
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 705
540% 716 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 237%
Great: 372%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 731 1146 1227 1283 1169 1085 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-152.A00G 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2932 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 59.3
MC Mixed 35.5
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 9.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 107%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 3 Pro-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback