HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 21 '18 at 09:21
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 760-$100 34,495 User benchmarks, average bench 64% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 90.7 1-Core 81.2 2-Core 144 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 226 8-Core 288 33% 257 Pts	64-Core 276 17% 276 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% MSI(1462 8A9B) CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 22.1 Reflection 17 Parallax 20.2 18% 19.8 fps	MRender 25.1 Gravity 21.1 Splatting 16.9 17% 21.1 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 215 125 65 56 54 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.5% Average	Read 235 Write 228 Mixed 196 SusWrite 123 44% 195 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 17.4 4K Mixed 14.4 48% 15.1 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 196 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 114%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB 157 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 0122 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.7 0.9 3.6 7.4 6.6 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	3.78% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 3.5 Mixed 0.2 SusWrite 4.2 6% 5.78 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.78% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:85 9B CT51264BA160BJ.C8 ID:85 9B CT51264BD160BJ.M8 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160BJ.C8 ID:85 9B CT51264BD160BJ.M8 52GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.8% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 13.7 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 11.2 SC Mixed 11.5 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 66.2 60% 66.2 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	388x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	73x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	60x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	285x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	65x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	56x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	17x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	13x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 44GBUnknownBench 30%, 232 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16