Asus M5A97 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 20 '18 at 18:38
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
55% Above average
Memory 76
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 102
48% 76 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 196
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Sapphire(174B E204) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 2.38
Parallax 2.09
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.77
Splatting 2.04
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 250GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 95 73 77 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 290
Write 224
Mixed 116
SusWrite 84.4
131% 179 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.3
377% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 108%
Great: 171%
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 1.5TB
449GB free
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 82 93 70 74 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.1% Below average
Read 22.5
Write 104
Mixed 70
SusWrite 82
52% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.1% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 9.07 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 PRO Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback