HP EliteBook 840 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 840 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83B2
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180125
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 20 '18 at 12:40
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 89%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8350U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 229
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 626
63% 514 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 83B2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 24.20.100.6229
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.96% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 9.58
Parallax 6.88
6% 7.95 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 15.3
9% 10 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.96%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV256TBN-1AR15ABHA 256GB
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0T14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 150 148 149 144 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 438
Write 391
Mixed 227
SusWrite 141
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 18
87% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16.5
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 17.9
34% 63 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 10.7
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 90.9
44% 90.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 G5 Builds (Compare 3,903 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 840 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback