ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer Predator PH517-51

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	83.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Acer Predator PH517-51 (all builds)
Motherboard	CFL Cayman_CFS
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180503
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 19 '18 at 12:28
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 91.1 1-Core 122 2-Core 228 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 613 62% 504 Pts	64-Core 760 47% 760 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Acer(1025 1243) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2152 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.92 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Lighting 102 Reflection 124 Parallax 96.5 83% 107 fps	MRender 99.6 Gravity 97.9 Splatting 106 83% 101 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 14,022 User benchmarks, average bench 160% 328GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57XA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 928 981 1326 1435 1455 1423 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	214% Outstanding	Read 1,271 Write 1,192 Mixed 854 SusWrite 1,258 258% 1,144 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 90.8 4K Mixed 47.9 159% 57.2 MB/s	DQ Read 991 DQ Write 662 DQ Mixed 629 523% 761 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 214% Great: 235%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 931GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 117 116 117 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Read 136 Write 110 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 116 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.8 197% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GB 6,230 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 8400 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.6% Very good	MC Read 29.9 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 22.4 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 25.5 SC Mixed 24.5 64% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Predator PH517-51 Builds (Compare 584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation

Workstation 49%

Yacht

System: Acer Predator PH517-51

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	429x
Core i9-8950HKIntelBench 74%, 14,729 samples	151x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	581x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	3x

SSD
HFS256GD9MNE-6200A 256GBBench 190%, 1,347 samples	51x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	40x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples	39x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 6,230 samples	130x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 28,425 samples	109x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback