HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory9.2 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091209
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 19 '18 at 02:27
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
44.3% Average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 41.4
2-Core 83.2
44% 66.6 Pts
4-Core 81.3
8-Core 84.4
11% 82.9 Pts
64-Core 84.5
5% 84.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E157) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.03% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.44 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.19 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.03%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
425GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 17 47 43 43 7.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 17.1
Write 70.3
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 36.4
28% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:02 9E CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:02 9E CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 48GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.9% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 4.7
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback