Dell System XPS L702X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 41% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemDell System XPS L702X  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XN71K
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '18 at 07:01
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 21.2
2-Core 47.5
28% 40.5 Pts
4-Core 76
8-Core 73.7
10% 74.8 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
Dell(1028 04B8) 3GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
4.48% Terrible
Lighting 4.87
Reflection 6.08
Parallax 2.12
4% 4.36 fps
MRender 7.24
Gravity 5.23
Splatting 7.39
6% 6.62 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.48%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 402
Write 388
Mixed 312
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 20.8
64% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 84.4
DQ Mixed 94.7
73% 100 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
484GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 53.3
Mixed 40.5
53% 71.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL SODIMM DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical System XPS L702X Builds (Compare 619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell System XPS L702X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback