Dell System XPS L702X

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 74% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemDell System XPS L702X  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0XN71K
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120907
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 18 '18 at 04:12
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 74%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 46.5
2-Core 90
42% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 237
25% 198 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 555M
Dell(1028 04B8) 3GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.66% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 6.35
Parallax 1.75
4% 4.4 fps
MRender 7.43
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 7.61
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.66%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 442
Write 423
Mixed 338
89% 401 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 31.5
97% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 167
125% 168 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
484GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 126
Write 124
Mixed 73
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL SODIMM DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 9
24% 8.57 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical System XPS L702X Builds (Compare 619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell System XPS L702X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback