Asrock H310M-HDV/M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H310M-HDV/M.2  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180213
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 16 '18 at 22:30
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 226
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 408
57% 420 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Lighting 29.1
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 33.8
24% 31.8 fps
MRender 31.4
Gravity 27
Splatting 34.8
26% 31 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-GEN03AS18EU120G 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0114
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 55 56 172 76 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 336
Write 41.2
Mixed 45.2
SusWrite 125
30% 137 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 8.1
45% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 16.2
12% 16.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
316GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 159 158 160 160 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 168
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 160
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 11.6
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310M-HDV/M.2 Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H310M-HDV/M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $197
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback