Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics94.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 16 '18 at 20:27
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 97.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 193
80% 134 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 448
58% 438 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 121
Parallax 104
99% 115 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 105
Splatting 106
86% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 332 311 314 314 313 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 483
Mixed 401
SusWrite 305
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 62.1
209% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 331
250% 336 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.85% Terrible
Read 14
Write 17
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 16
13% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 8.85%
Great: 90%
Lexar JumpDrive S25 USB 3.0 32GB-$13
30GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 37 36 38 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 130
Write 39.3
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 36.5
83% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
100% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 27.2
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 24.2
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 48.6
82% 48.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI HERO Builds (Compare 2,371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $649
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback