ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo F0C2001AMT

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	87.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Lenovo F0C2001AMT (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 3647
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit väriä
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160418
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Aug 15 '18 at 06:41
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400T 8,631 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 76.7 1-Core 87.3 2-Core 163 64% 109 Pts	4-Core 316 8-Core 319 42% 317 Pts	64-Core 318 20% 318 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950A 156 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Legend(17AA 3647) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9882 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Lighting 17.9 Reflection 13.2 Parallax 15.7 15% 15.6 fps	MRender 19.9 Gravity 16.9 Splatting 12.8 13% 16.5 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-000L1 256GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT22L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 283 286 287 286 278 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	87.4% Excellent	Read 470 Write 290 Mixed 240 SusWrite 281 71% 320 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 91 4K Mixed 30 136% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 273 DQ Mixed 33.2 83% 171 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 87.4% Great: 88%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$34 57,200 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 900GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 108 Mixed 60.3 64% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GB 32,056 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.6% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 8.9 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 9.9 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 86.9 46% 86.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback