Lenovo F0C2001AMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo F0C2001AMT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3647
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160418
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateAug 15 '18 at 06:31
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 81.2
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 166
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 322
42% 319 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950A
Legend(17AA 3647) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9882
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 13.3
Parallax 15.8
15% 15.8 fps
MRender 20.3
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 13.2
13% 16.9 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-000L1 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT22L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 287 286 287 274 270 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 488
Write 289
Mixed 239
SusWrite 281
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 37.8
150% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 33.6
DQ Write 80.7
DQ Mixed 37
34% 50.4 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$34
900GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 109 112 111 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 116
Write 0.5
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 110
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
37.2% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.6
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback