Lenovo 80ST

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80ST  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Toronto 5B1
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170117
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 15 '18 at 00:26
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 53.2
1-Core 22.8
2-Core 41.3
28% 39.1 Pts
4-Core 59.7
8-Core 65
8% 62.3 Pts
64-Core 71.6
4% 71.6 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 298 248 255 273 226 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 327
Write 293
Mixed 273
SusWrite 267
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 30.4
4K Mixed 25.5
83% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 157
119% 159 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3AZ 8GB
1200, 1200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 6
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.6
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80ST Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80ST

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback